In his dissertation, Jay Cristol claims one of the photos included is a gun sight photo taken by one of the attacking jets.
We have learned from the IDF that only one photo was provided to Dr. Cristol by the IDF and that photo is not the one in question.
In addition to misrepresenting the source of the photo there is some question as to whether it has been deliberately altered from its original condition (see the topic “The Fraudulence of ‘Gun Camera’ Photographs” at http://usslibertyinquiry.com/essays/essays.html
Judge Cristol, if the purpose of your screed is not “to convince anyone of anything” why the need to lie to your readers about the source of the photograph included in your dissertation and your book?
Judge Cristol, if the purpose of your screed is not “to convince anyone of anything” why do you make claims based on evidence that forensic analysis has determined to be faked?
